to edit and comment
a collaborative knowledge base characterizing the state of current thought in Cognitive Science.

dot pattern expectancy task TASK
Unreviewed

descendant of the expectancy AX task, participant views a combination of simple dot formations as cues and probes; for example, ".:." may be a target probe, but should only be responded to if preceded by the cue ":" rather than ".." or any other formation.

Alias(es)

DPX

Definition contributed by Anonymous
dot pattern expectancy task has been asserted to measure the following CONCEPTS
as measured by the contrast:



as measured by the contrast:



as measured by the contrast:



as measured by the contrast:



Phenotypes associated with dot pattern expectancy task

Disorders

No associations have been added.

Traits

No associations have been added.

Behaviors

No associations have been added.


IMPLEMENTATIONS of dot pattern expectancy task
No implementations have been added.
EXTERNAL DATASETS for dot pattern expectancy task
No implementations have been added.
CONDITIONS

Experimental conditions are the subsets of an experiment that define the relevant experimental manipulation.

CONTRASTS
valid versus invalid(edit)

In the Cognitive Atlas, we define a contrast as any function over experimental conditions. The simplest contrast is the indicator value for a specific condition; more complex contrasts include linear or nonlinear functions of the indicator across different experimental conditions.

INDICATORS
d`-context, the difference between the z-transformed probability of correct hits on valid trials and the z-transformed probability of false alarms on invalid trials
accuracy
response time

An indicator is a specific quantitative or qualitative variable that is recorded for analysis. These may include behavioral variables (such as response time, accuracy, or other measures of performance) or physiological variables (including genetics, psychophysiology, or brain imaging data).

Term BIBLIOGRAPHY

The dot pattern expectancy task: reliability and replication of deficits in schizophrenia.
Jones JA, Sponheim SR, MacDonald AW 3rd
Psychological assessment (Psychol Assess)
2010 Mar