to edit and comment
Explore the graph explore the graph
a collaborative knowledge base characterizing the state of current thought in Cognitive Science.
"Participants are required to name, as rapidly as possible, items presented visually on a chart. Each chart contains five rows of 10 stimuli from a category of five items. Categories include colors, lowercase letters, digits, and common objects. The tests are scored for total number of errors and time in seconds taken to complete each chart." - (Meyer, Wood, Hart, & Felton 1998)

Definition contributed by Anonymous
rapid automatized naming test has been asserted to measure the following CONCEPTS
Phenotypes associated with rapid automatized naming test

Disorders

No associations have been added.

Traits

No associations have been added.

Behaviors

No associations have been added.


IMPLEMENTATIONS of rapid automatized naming test
No implementations have been added.
EXTERNAL DATASETS for rapid automatized naming test
No implementations have been added.
CONDITIONS

Experimental conditions are the subsets of an experiment that define the relevant experimental manipulation.

CONTRASTS

You must specify conditions before you can define contrasts.


In the Cognitive Atlas, we define a contrast as any function over experimental conditions. The simplest contrast is the indicator value for a specific condition; more complex contrasts include linear or nonlinear functions of the indicator across different experimental conditions.

INDICATORS
time to complete task

An indicator is a specific quantitative or qualitative variable that is recorded for analysis. These may include behavioral variables (such as response time, accuracy, or other measures of performance) or physiological variables (including genetics, psychophysiology, or brain imaging data).

Term BIBLIOGRAPHY

Longitudinal course of rapid naming in disabled and nondisabled readers
Marianne S. Meyer, Frank B. Wood, Lesley A. Hart and Rebecca H. Felton
Annals of Dyslexia Volume 48, Number 1
1992

Selective predictive value of rapid automatized naming in poor readers.
Meyer MS, Wood FB, Hart LA, Felton RH
(J Learn Disabil)
1998 Mar-Apr