to edit and comment
Explore the graph explore the graph
a collaborative knowledge base characterizing the state of current thought in Cognitive Science.
In the continuous recognition paradigm, study and test phases are not separate entities, but rather, items are continuously presented and the participant is instructed to respond to an item as "old" if it has been seen before (generally presented a second time) in this continual stream of item presentation. Items that were correctly called "old" are the subsequently remembered trials, and items that were "missed" (not called old upon second presentation) make up the subsequently forgotten trials.

Definition contributed by Anonymous
continuous recognition paradigm has been asserted to measure the following CONCEPTS
as measured by the contrast:

Phenotypes associated with continuous recognition paradigm


No associations have been added.


No associations have been added.


No associations have been added.

IMPLEMENTATIONS of continuous recognition paradigm
No implementations have been added.
EXTERNAL DATASETS for continuous recognition paradigm
No implementations have been added.

Experimental conditions are the subsets of an experiment that define the relevant experimental manipulation.


You must specify conditions before you can define contrasts.

In the Cognitive Atlas, we define a contrast as any function over experimental conditions. The simplest contrast is the indicator value for a specific condition; more complex contrasts include linear or nonlinear functions of the indicator across different experimental conditions.


An indicator is a specific quantitative or qualitative variable that is recorded for analysis. These may include behavioral variables (such as response time, accuracy, or other measures of performance) or physiological variables (including genetics, psychophysiology, or brain imaging data).


A mechanistic account of the mirror effect for word frequency: a computational model of remember-know judgments in a continuous recognition paradigm.
Reder LM, Nhouyvanisvong A, Schunn CD, Ayers MS, Angstadt P, Hiraki K
(J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn)
2000 Mar