to edit and comment
a collaborative knowledge base characterizing the state of current thought in Cognitive Science.

Coherent/Incoherent discourse distinction task TASK
Unreviewed

Measures ability to distinguish between coherent and incoherent sentences and discourse

Definition contributed by Anonymous
Coherent/Incoherent discourse distinction task has been asserted to measure the following CONCEPTS
No concepts assertions have been added.

Phenotypes associated with Coherent/Incoherent discourse distinction task

Disorders

No associations have been added.

Traits

No associations have been added.

Behaviors

No associations have been added.


IMPLEMENTATIONS of Coherent/Incoherent discourse distinction task
No implementations have been added.
EXTERNAL DATASETS for Coherent/Incoherent discourse distinction task
No implementations have been added.
CONDITIONS

Experimental conditions are the subsets of an experiment that define the relevant experimental manipulation.

CONTRASTS

You must specify conditions before you can define contrasts.


In the Cognitive Atlas, we define a contrast as any function over experimental conditions. The simplest contrast is the indicator value for a specific condition; more complex contrasts include linear or nonlinear functions of the indicator across different experimental conditions.

INDICATORS

No indicators have yet been associated.

An indicator is a specific quantitative or qualitative variable that is recorded for analysis. These may include behavioral variables (such as response time, accuracy, or other measures of performance) or physiological variables (including genetics, psychophysiology, or brain imaging data).

Term BIBLIOGRAPHY

Centering: a framework for modeling the local coherence of discourse
Barbara J. Grosz, Scott Weinstein, and Aravind K. Joshi
Comput. Linguist. 21, 2 (June 1995), 203-225
1995